The Agnostids otherwise known as Arthropod and the passage and the speaker discussing the there living type but in very contrast ways. The lecture argues all three theories stated in the passage by following evidences.
First, passage says that it could be free swimmer in the large sea area because that has ability to swim faster and long distance. Further, it is active predator, they might eat the small organism because there are plenty of small organism less than six millimetre in size and Agnostic may be preyed them easily, for that passage gives some fossil evidences to prove that the idea. But, the speaker refutes this idea by stating that most of the arthropod has well developed vision and their primitive was poor developed eyesight. So, it is highly impossible to state that it could be free swimmer and some of are blind. They might not developed other sensory organ to prey the small organism as the passage statement.
Secondly, the reading suggests that it might be sea floor dweller, the reasons are they were the scavenging the dead organism or they grazed on the bacteria for their survival in deepest part of the ocean. Again, the professor refuses this statement by explaining that in order to get their food they must move faster but that is not possible for primitive arthropod to move fast for long distance. Moreover, if, that is case it supposed to colonised in one are but wide spreader in vast of the ocean. No more multiple colonise were found as research report.
Thirdly, the passage claims that, it seems like the arthropod could be parasites because modern arthropods like fleas, ticks and mites, they use to be parasites in many primitive fishes at present days. Still, the lecturer opposes this theory by explaining that, as per fossil record it widespreader in sea area. But, parasites usually-lives limited area only. The most of the evidences assure that their population spread all over the ocean part, not in specific location.
To sum up, the passage claims like Agnosids might be free swimmer, seafloor dweller or parasites but speaker refutes all these three with strong evidences like data and recent fossil records. So, the professor virtually disagrees with reading passage without any doubts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'millimetre' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'millimetres'.
Suggestion: millimetres
... plenty of small organism less than six millimetre in size and Agnostic may be preyed them...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the deepest'.
Suggestion: in the deepest
...azed on the bacteria for their survival in deepest part of the ocean. Again, the professor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...opods like fleas, ticks and mites, they use to be parasites in many primitive fishe...
^^^
Line 9, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith reading passage without any doubts.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, well, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1373.03311258 137% => OK
No of words: 376.0 270.72406181 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00265957447 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40367714522 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 145.348785872 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526595744681 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 419.366225166 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7058823529 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.647058824 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1176470588 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267550698478 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750111312255 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498269930586 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132997116809 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334156775023 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.