When it comes to how to manage universities' budgets, people in general believe that universities are supposed to renovate old buildings or renewing facilities in order to attract new students. On the other hand, quite a few people argue that schools should use money for improving faculties. Although spending money on infrastructure and physical plant certainly is a feasible way to attract students, investing in keeping the faculty satisfied is more significant.
To begin with, despite the fact that enhancing the quality of facilities or physical plants does help to satisfy students with a more enjoyable and appealing environment for learning, improving the teaching quality of professors is more crucial not only for attracting new students, but also for existed students and alumni. Many schools spent budgets on renovating buildings, buying latest technology equipment or planting more trees around the campus; however, students' academic performance were still not improved. Only by improving the quality of faculties can students have excellent performance in academy; hence, a university could consequently be best known for outstanding school. Therefore, investing in faculties make school become more popular.
Moreover, making faculties satisfied prevents them from changing jobs. It is common for workers to consider what benefits and costs are in choosing career. It is also usual for them to compare benefits and costs. Do benefits outweigh costs in the job? Or does this job require to pay more cons than pros? As a result, if school stop satisfying professors, professors will think that one benefit diminishes, and one drawback increases. They start to harbor thoughts of changing jobs. Then they compare benefits of working in university to having jobs in private firms. Clearly spending extra profits to hire professional researchers is an investment that private firms are willing to do, which in contrast schools are reluctant to invest. Thus, if school stop keeping faculties satisfied, they consider changing career for acquiring more profits.
Accordingly, since professors are essential of attracting students, schools should not hesitate to invest their budgets in making faculties more contented rather than in infrastructure and physical plant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 377, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'buying the latest'.
Suggestion: buying the latest
... spent budgets on renovating buildings, buying latest technology equipment or planting more t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to career'
Suggestion: to career
...what benefits and costs are in choosing career. It is also usual for them to compare b...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'paying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: paying
...ts in the job? Or does this job require to pay more cons than pros? As a result, if sc...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'but', 'consequently', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'in contrast', 'in general', 'as a result', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.251948051948 0.261695866417 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.207792207792 0.158904122519 131% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0961038961039 0.0723426182421 133% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0571428571429 0.0435111971325 131% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0233766233766 0.0277247811725 84% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119480519481 0.128828473217 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0805194805195 0.0370669169778 217% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.87439043129 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0415584415584 0.0208969081088 199% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.038961038961 0.128158765124 30% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.012987012987 0.0158828679856 82% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.012987012987 0.0114777025283 113% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2276.0 1645.83664459 138% => OK
No of words: 346.0 271.125827815 128% => OK
Chars per words: 6.57803468208 6.08160592843 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.04852973271 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.471098265896 0.374372842146 126% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.398843930636 0.287516216867 139% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.291907514451 0.187439937562 156% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.182080924855 0.113142543107 161% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87439043129 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 145.348785872 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586705202312 0.539623497131 109% => OK
Word variations: 66.9818702453 53.8517498576 124% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0529801325 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.2222222222 21.7502111507 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.9741202223 49.3711431718 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.444444444 132.220823453 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 21.7502111507 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 59.1066152858 50.5018328374 117% => OK
Elegance: 1.56756756757 1.90840788429 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322560417344 0.549887131256 59% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.121639762616 0.142949733639 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.103828439527 0.0787303798458 132% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.455377235446 0.631733273073 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.195311507187 0.139662658121 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110283278153 0.266732575781 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678965726821 0.103435571967 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.253779656069 0.414875509568 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0335645056466 0.0530846634433 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207123670817 0.40443939384 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731008406542 0.0528353158467 138% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 4.33554083885 346% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.