The reading and the lecture are both debate about whether the bees were present 200 million years ago? Some structures have been found in Arizona State and some people believe that these were bee's nest. The author of the passage states that many skeptics believe these do not belong to bees and propose three arguments for that. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the passage and claims that these arguments are not convincing.
Firstly, the passage states that there is no fossil of bees that belongs to 200 million years ago. The professor challenges this point and explains that fossil bees may be destructed and there were not enough trees. He also explains that most such trees have appeared later on the earth.
Secondly, the author asserts that there were not flowering plants, hence the bees could not have existed at that time. However, the professor casts doubt on this point and illustrates that bees maybe have been appeared on the earth before the flowering plants. He believes that some of the plants after evolution changed to flowering plants.
Thirdly, the passage asserts that the fossil structures are lack of some details that the nest of the modern bees has. The professor contradicts this point and states that by precise analysis of the chambers, scientists revealed that some waterproofing materials exist in the chambers. These materials are exist in the nest of the modern bees, hence, the fossils belong to bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... the flowering plants. He believes that some of the plants after evolution changed to flowe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...st in the chambers. These materials are exist in the nest of the modern bees, hence, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02049180328 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26942257477 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47131147541 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.1548260458 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.2307692308 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0989455055696 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410154285715 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299267567128 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0645558042487 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158047522088 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.