In this set of materials, based on the reading passage, some skeptics have doubt that bees have existed on earth as two hundred million years ago and cite several arguments. However, the speaker expresses none of these reasons are convincing.
The author mentions since, the earliest preserved body of a bee is one hundred years old, there were no bees in two hundred years ago. Whereas, the professor argues since, fossils have typically preserved in fossilized trees risen and trees with type of rise were very rare in two hundred years ago, no fossil remain of actual bees have ever been found that date to that time.
In addition, based on the passage since, bees and flowering plants have a close, mutually depending biological relationship and flowering plants first appeared on earth 125 million years ago, it is unlikely bees could have existed before that time. But, in the lecture, the speaker mentions it is likely before the flowering plants appeared on earth, bees was feeding on non-flowering plants like ferns, and when these plants appeared, bees was adopting themselves to feed on flowering plants.
Moreover, in the reading section, the author cites the fossilized chambers lack caps which exist in modern bees nests. However, based on the listening part, there are chemical evidences which support that fossilized chambers are similar to nests chambers made by modern bees. Ancient bees use a chemical composition to protect their nests chambers from water, like modern bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s. However, based on the listening part, there are chemical evidences which suppo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, moreover, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1393442623 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41985205249 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9893191024 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.333333333 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0502247677842 0.272083759551 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0219471256223 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.023271891133 0.0662205650399 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0337960005316 0.162205337803 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203974441386 0.0443174109184 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.