TPO 47
Pterosaurs were ancient reptiles that had wings. The lecture states that these animals were not able to fly, and it provide three reason of support. The professor opposes this statement and mentions that these animals were capable to fly and reject all of the three reasons one by one.
Firs, the article states that evidence shows Pterosaurs were cold-blood and they did not have enough energy to fly. On the other hand, the professor mentions that they had a dense hair cover that helped them to stay warm, so it was possible for them to fly.
Second, Pterosaurs were as large as a Giraffe and heavy that prevent them to wing fast enough and fly. On the contrary, the professor states that they had some features that made them less heavy as they seem. For example they had many hollow in the bones.
Third, the text claims that Pterosaurs was not able to take off like other powered flight animals. Other animals can jump or run to take off, while Pterosaurs had lack of strong muscles to jump or fly. In contrast, the professor states that Pterosaurs walk on the four legs that can give them ability fo jump or run enough for taking off.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...se animals were not able to fly, and it provide three reason of support. The professor ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... animals were capable to fly and reject all of the three reasons one by one. Firs, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, third, while, for example, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 1373.03311258 69% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6243902439 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10528357171 2.5805825403 82% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526829268293 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2785962097 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1818181818 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35963773637 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14982306501 0.0996497079465 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811467935776 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209648409208 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263436757015 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.2367328918 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.42419426049 84% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 63.6247240618 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.