tpo 47
The material discusses the concept of the ability of pterosaurs to fly and glide. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this toic, namely pterosaurs were cold-blooded animals, so they could generate enough energy reqiued to fly. Next, pterosaurs could not fly because they were too heavy. Finally, pterosaurs' back leg muscles could not suppoert them to lanch themselves into the air.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points, one specific contradiction is pterosaurs had dense hair like fure, which is typical like the warm-blooded animals. As a result, it could increase their body temprature, and supply them suffucient amount of energy needed to fly. In addition to that, anatomically pterosaurs were light, given that their bones are hallow instead of solid; thus, they wieght low despite their body fram. Therefore, they could airbone by powered flight. One final point, birds fly by diferrent way, they use just their two back limbs for jumping or running to fly. However, pterosaurs used their all four limbs to push themselves, according to thet there were no trouble to run fast or to jump high and launch themselves into the air.
In summary, there are discrepancies in the information presented.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ints outlined in the reading passage. Firstly, the reading details specific po...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hem to lanch themselves into the air. Conversely, the listening challenges the...
^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'hallowed'.
Suggestion: hallowed
... were light, given that their bones are hallow instead of solid; thus, they wieght low...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h and launch themselves into the air. In summary, there are discrepancies in t...
^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...repancies in the information presented.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in summary, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34722222222 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71128756256 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8937147235 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.25 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.06452816374 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326388001882 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113906308147 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637588106545 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150195305957 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118440671748 0.0443174109184 267% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.