Due to the condition that many frog species have declined or even gone die, the reading offers three possible methods to solve this problem. But the speaking argues that all these methods have, in fact, problems.
To begin with, the passage asserts that prohibiting farmers from using pesticides which cause frogs getting sever breathing problems can significantly solve the problem. Unlikely, the professor disagrees with this idea. She then appoints that this is not fair for farmers who live near frogs. Without pesticides, it is almost impossible for these farmers to compete with others who do not live with frogs and are allowed to use pesticides, because these farmers have low yields. So this cannot be used as an effective method.
Then, according to the passage, a kind of fungus it a major factor and if we apply some treatments to kill these fungus, we would protect frogs. This method is also argued by the professor. She then tells us that if we apply treatments, we have to treat each frogs indivually and we have to treat them again and again when they born new frogs. So it is impossible because it is too complex and expensive.
Moreover, it is true that the speaking acknowledges what the reading says that their habitats are threatened by human activities, however, the excessive water use and development are not the most important threaten. In fact, global warming is the key factor. Thus protection frogs’ habitats from the excessive water use and development is unlikely to change the dangerous situation now.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fungus' or 'these fungi', 'these funguses'?
Suggestion: this fungus; these fungi; these funguses
...and if we apply some treatments to kill these fungus, we would protect frogs. This method is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...fact, global warming is the key factor. Thus protection frogs' habitats from th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, in fact, kind of, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03112840467 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60189987618 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603112840467 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.7920268493 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3571428571 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388256288632 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10929485158 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926937881116 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21538819046 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486106375588 0.0443174109184 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.