Based on the given materials, the article as well as the lecture discusses the ways of controlling the salt level in The Salton Sea in California. The author states three ways to encounter this problem. That being said, the lecturer provides several reasons to repudiate this claim since she thinks, it is not practical.
Initially, the author says that they could remove salt from lake's water directly in special desalination facilities. However, the lecturer explains that this way may be jeopardize. On the other hand, releasing type of chemical toxic substance causes health risk to the extend that could be harmful.
Second, the writer proclaims that an another option to reduce salt which dilute the salt level in lake with water from the Ocean. Yet again, the speaker underscores that this option needs pipelines and canals as length of 100 Km roughly. Constructing of these pipelines and canals could be expensive and they do not have enough resource to build these.
The final point of contention between reading and listening passages is constructing walls to divide the into several section. The author thinks by constructing these walls, they are able to allocate the lake's water into special sections. On the other hand, the speaker explains that this option could be effective in short-term. For very long, it cannot solved the issue. Furthermore, An earthquake could be collapse all these walls and mixed back the water from the specific zone into other zones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...l toxic substance causes health risk to the extend that could be harmful. Second, the w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[2]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...xic substance causes health risk to the extend that could be harmful. Second, the w...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'an option' or 'another option'.
Suggestion: an option; another option
...l. Second, the writer proclaims that an another option to reduce salt which dilute the salt le...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun section seems to be countable; consider using: 'several sections'.
Suggestion: several sections
...s constructing walls to divide the into several section. The author thinks by constructing thes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, well, in short, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53013056694 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578512396694 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4210288531 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.7857142857 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2857142857 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162510110801 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542107108428 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562831786834 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992928641975 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130227053742 0.0443174109184 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.