In this set of materials, the reading passage mainly discusses about some ways could be useful to decreasing the amount of salt in a salty lakes water which is located in California, while in the listening passage the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text. However, the lecturer thinks these are neither realistic nor practical and proceeds to cast doubt upon them.
First of all, in the reading passage, it is clearly stated that one way is using a particular equipment which can covey lakes water by pumping, distill it, and then release it to the lake. However, the professor believes that this is not true. She claims that remaining things with this essayist mixture of salt and toxic materials which is very harmful because it can be carried by wind, as a consequence people breathe it.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that adding the pacific oceans water to the lake by canals and pipelines can be practical. She points out that this solution is really expensive and the local government do not have enough money to support is because ocean is one hundred kilometers far from the salty lake, as a result the local government has to pay a lot of money which is more than its income, therefor this way is impossible also.
Finally, although in the text it is mentioned that constructing some walls in the lake and dividing lake to some parts could be a good suggestion because they can direct freshwater from small rivers to main part and by allowing to small part of the lake to be salty more and more, fishes and birds can have normal life in main part, the professor subscribes to this view that its a short term solution because this wall swill be destroyed by earthquake so it is not a good way for long perspective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...income, therefor this way is impossible also. Finally, although in the text it i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 378, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... professor subscribes to this view that its a short term solution because this wall...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, really, so, still, then, while, as to, in addition, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62162162162 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47149564498 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530405405405 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 21.2450331126 198% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 132.493665617 49.2860985944 269% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 195.428571429 110.228320801 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.2857142857 21.698381199 195% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.0 7.06452816374 226% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182146819684 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886890525884 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581484096382 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123315965339 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348583285958 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.3589403974 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.77 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.0289183223 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.498013245 179% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 11.2008830022 196% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.