TPO 7 integrated: receiving the eco-certification in wood companies of United States
In the reading, the author claims that wood companies in the United States are reluctant to receive the eco-certification, which endorses the company's approaches are compatible with the environment, by pointing out 3 reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas questionable and implausible, the lecturer casts doubt on what is presented in the text and states some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that the Americans attitude toward the commercials is unfavorable. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that people have not the same mindset toward all of the advertisements. Indeed, they makes a big difference between those ads produced by the company owners and the others which are created by the independent agencies. Therefore, so trustworthy and reputable are these international agencies that people pay sufficient attention to them.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that a rise in the price of the eco-certificated production leads to a drop in their demand. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying the fact that Americans merely consider the price if the other options will be the same. Consequently, differentiating less than 5%, individuals do take other factors in to account particularly when the protection of the environment is the matter of concern.
Finally, the author asserts that wood companies in the United States opt to have internal market within the country instead of outside of it. The lecturer, thought, dismisses it by subscribing to the point that eventually, American's companies have no other choice but admitting utilizing this eco-certification due to the coercion of foreign competition. Admittedly, if they do not entered into these spheres, the other companies from abroad will capture their market, and the unfavorable ramification will be undoubtedly unprecedented.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...people have not the same mindset toward all of the advertisements. Indeed, they makes a bi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...all of the advertisements. Indeed, they makes a big difference between those ads prod...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45890410959 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24439988382 2.5805825403 126% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592465753425 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6188641297 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234720223819 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732839733621 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975986986357 0.0662205650399 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137837354339 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104872960708 0.0443174109184 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.