TPO16
The lecture and the article are both about the archeological sites investigation in Britain which have had a long history in the United State. The author feels that today archeology is faced a serious probleme and some ignorance in the Britain and provides three explanations to substantiate the problemes. The lecturer challenges the claim made by the article, She claims that these explanations are faulty.
To begin with, the author states that because of the growth of population in the Britain, many new buildings are constructed so these constructions destroyed the archeological sites. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. The lecturer mentions that before the digging foundation, the site should be avaluate under supervision of archeologists. Therefore, no new building is constructed withouth archeological assessments.
Secondly, the writer suggests that financial supports are inadequate. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that constructions company should pay the archeological evaluation expenses instead of the government. Moreover, in these years the rate of archeological investigations is higher than the past.
Last but not least, the article posits that the archeology careers are very limited and find a proper job is very challenging in this field. In contrast, the lecturer position is that noweday there are a lot of good job in the archeology fields. For example, the building archeological assessment, gathering and prossessing datas in archeology and at the end publishing these valuable datas in articles are the important jobs for archeologists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sites'' or 'site's'?
Suggestion: sites'; site's
...rticle are both about the archeological sites investigation in Britain which have had...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...anations to substantiate the problemes. The lecturer challenges the claim made by t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69834710744 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27826614104 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578512396694 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0962868566 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.076923077 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130411404134 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467416812531 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426492314064 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804510516259 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318020925455 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.2367328918 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.