TPO39
The reading claims that there are several evidences about what cause about massive extinct. However, the lecture disagrees with those ideas.
First of all, the reading claims that the mass-extinction occurred because of the decline of the sea levels. However, the lecture disagrees with this idea. It is true the sea levels had been decline. But it happened gradually. The species living in coastal and shallow-ocean can adapt those gradually change. So it was unlikely caused massive extinction. Only the sea levels decline suddenly can cause those species diet out.
Secondly, the reading claims that because the massive climate cooling cause massive extinction. However, the lecture disagrees with this idea. It is true that in the atmosphere contains S02, but it is in relative short time. The S02 could be cleared out by combining with water and fall back as rain. So it was unlikely that those S02 can block the sunlight.
Finally, the reading claims that the asteroid strike caused the massive extinction. However, the lecture disagrees with this idea. According to record, there are nothing related with asteroides striked on Earth surface, and there are no debris appeared on Earth surface. Also, the researchers didn't find any crater on the Earth surface. So it is unlikely caused by asteroids. Only one crater records were be find, but it is 12 milion years ago. It’s have nothing to do with the massive extinction, because it is too long ago.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 294, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...on Earth surface. Also, the researchers didnt find any crater on the Earth surface. S...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 406, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...asteroids. Only one crater records were be find, but it is 12 milion years ago. It...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1235.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14583333333 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50482520459 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3682279782 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 58.8095238095 110.228320801 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.4285714286 21.698381199 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.90476190476 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.3589403974 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 53.8541721854 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.41 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.