Tpo41: professor and passage challenge each others on how to rules on coal ash could beneficial
The female professor in the lecture finds it unacceptable to assert that it is unnecessary to make new regulations to coal ash and might have negative influence. In other words, she casts doubt on what the reading passage states. And in the lecture, she uses three convincing points to support her idea.
To begin with, the author of the reading passage contends that there have been effective regulations to the ash coal that companies must use liner-special material in every new pond they build. The speaker, however, refutes that old pond also need to use liner-special material owing to the fact that coal ash release from old pond would sink into ground water and turn into the drink water that have significant damage to people's health. Apparently, the idea of the reading material is dubious.
Furthermore, contrary to the notion given by the reading passage that new regulations may discourage people to buy the product which is made by recycling of coal ash, the lecturer claims that the new regulation would not cause significant influence to the recycle products, for example, she talks about mercury which will cause damage to people's body, however, they have used a lot of products made of recycle mercury and have few concerns about these products, which differs from what the reading reveals.
Last but not least, the listening material confute the statement showed in the reading passage that new regulations would increase the price of electricity and will not welcomed by public, by pointing out that the average price of the electricity would just increase 1%, therefore it is worth, Clearly, it is a third point which is in conflict with its counterpart in the reading passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...convincing points to support her idea. To begin with, the author of the reading...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 428, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...k water that have significant damage to peoples health. Apparently, the idea of the rea...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ea of the reading material is dubious. Furthermore, contrary to the notion give...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...bout mercury which will cause damage to peoples body, however, they have used a lot of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...differs from what the reading reveals. Last but not least, the listening materi...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ement showed in the reading passage that new regulations would increase the pric...
^^
Line 4, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that new regulations would increase the price of electricity and will not welcom...
^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'welcome'
Suggestion: welcome
... the price of electricity and will not welcomed by public, by pointing out that the ave...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, third, for example, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01413427562 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6046885327 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519434628975 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 21.2450331126 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 152.800319044 49.2860985944 310% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 177.375 110.228320801 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.375 21.698381199 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.75 7.06452816374 209% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37386452954 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149334864779 0.0996497079465 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11347719921 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214525449599 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077890944879 0.0443174109184 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.3589403974 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.498013245 152% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.