TPO42
To deal with the problem that birds fly through glass windows, the passage suggests three possible solutions. However, the lecturer thinks none of them works.
Regarding to the issue of one-way glass, the passage thinks replacing regular glass with one way glass can prevent birds from flying through the glass, while the lecturer points out that it is ineffective. To birds from outside, one-way glass acts as mirrors. The birds cannot distinguish between reflection and open air and will fly through the glass.
Furthermore, the passage suggests to use colorful design to paint the glass. On the contrary, the lecturer states that birds think the opening of the glass as holes and will fly through it. To prevent this, the opening has to be extremely small, which makes the building dark.
Last but not least, the passage assures that creating magnetic field can guide the bird away from the building. In contrast, the lecturer challenge this by stating that birds use magnetic field to guide them only when travelling through long distance. During short distance trips, birds use their sight to navigate them, and the magnetic field is unlikely to guide them away from the building.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, regarding, so, while, as to, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 196.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08163265306 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28878142429 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545918367347 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 419.366225166 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4807199827 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5454545455 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.50294959428 0.272083759551 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207754935637 0.0996497079465 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108330013072 0.0662205650399 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300680053416 0.162205337803 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114470237861 0.0443174109184 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.