tpo44
Both the reading and lecture are about a European silver coin which was brought to Maine-one of the Native American site-by Norse. As a matter a fact, Norse were European people who were settled in North America in eastern Canada. The reading provides three reasons for being fake of this coin and then supports them. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and finds all arguments dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that there is a great distance between native America's site and North America as much as a thousand kilometers, so there could not be a connection between these mentioned sites. This point is challenged by the professor. She claims that in Mania site, a huge number of other objects were found by archaeologists that those objects had been brought from far distances even more than distance among native and North America. She elaborates on this by mentioning that all of them have historical explanations, so the distance fails to be a reason for being fake.
Secondly, the article contends that from eastern Canada that Norse lived there, did not find other coins; in the contrast the lecturer poses that since Norse did not stay permanently in Canada; therefore, there is a possibility that Norse packed their all objects when they returned to Europe, so lack of coin in that site is obvious.
Finally, the reading passage states that silver was not important in America and Norse were aware from this fact; consequently, bringing coin to the Maine site could be useless. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer again and she expresses that Norse people knew that American people had a tendency toward unusual objects; hence, they may have applied coin silvers to make necklace or jewelry. One should notice that a trade between two aforementioned regions could have happened.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, hence, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98381877023 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48219009884 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550161812298 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.3267284449 49.2860985944 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436215715912 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146904780179 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926167251685 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257411225722 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500057373258 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.