TPO49-Humpback whales
Although the passage explains how humpback whales may navigate by stars, the professor in the lecture considers it not convincing.
First, there does not seem to be a connection between intelligence and the ability to use stars to navigate. The professor argues that the ability may not be developed but just an instinct, giving the example of some other less intelligent animals such as ducks and birds who take advantage of stars as navigation. Therefore, humpback whales may just happen to be able to use stars to navigate.
Second, other than stars' direction, there may be different explanations for humpback whales' migration in straight lines. Evidence suggests that there is a biomagnitite in the brain of whales, so they can rely on Earth magnetic field to provide them with external force by which to maintain direction over long distances.
Third, the behavior of spy-hopping is not necessarily connected with looking at the stars. Even if it is a rare behavior, there are still other animals in the nature practicing the same position. For example, sharks sometimes do this behavior, but they don't migrate or look at the stars at all, they just use this gesture to help them hunt. Also, whales are sometimes found floating straight up during day, when the stars cannot be seen at all. In conclusion, it may be a pure speculation of humans to consider spy-hopping as a method of looking at the stars for navigation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... there is a biomagnitite in the brain of whales, so they can rely on Earth magnet...
^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ks sometimes do this behavior, but they dont migrate or look at the stars at all, th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, second, so, still, therefore, third, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.975 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75427697712 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.176228245 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.545454545 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501677656081 0.272083759551 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174721001584 0.0996497079465 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741209302837 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280092628531 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999818226568 0.0443174109184 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.