TPO54 salt level
In the passage, the author provides three ways to reserve the trend that is threatening the lake's health by salty. However, in the lecture, the professor claims it is not realistic or practical from all three aspects.
To begin with, the author holds the view that we can use special desalination facilities to remove the salt from the lake's water. Nonetheless, in the lecture, the professor indicates that this action may cause health risk because the water may have some toxic things. If the toxic things are released into the air, it will be dangerous to people.
The second point the professor casts doubt on is diluting the salt level in the lake with ocean water. In the passage, the author makes the point that we can use sea water to dilute the salt level. However, in the lecture, the professor totally disagrees with that. He states that it is expensive to construct channels in such long distance, and the government may not have resource to pay.
Another evidence the professor provides to refute the author is dividing the lake. In the passage, the author considers that we may construct walls to divide the lake into several sections which are different in salt level. Conversely, in the lecture, the professor claims that this way can not solve the problem in the long term. If there is the earthquake, the wall will collapse.
To sum up, it is not convincing that three ways can solve the problem realistically and practically.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lakes'' or 'lake's'?
Suggestion: lakes'; lake's
...serve the trend that is threatening the lakes health by salty. However, in the lectur...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87148594378 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50805061713 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481927710843 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.0 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 2.5761589404 349% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2299627508 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.6428571429 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133589002164 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496822138024 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838703805313 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687110808431 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732847305876 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.