The reading presents three theories to explain why the 52-hertz whale sings at such a high pitch. However, the professor dismisses all of these theories by claiming that they all have certain flaws.
First, the professor thinks the 52-hertz whale is unlikely a hybrid since its migration pattern is too unusual. To specify, even a hybrid’s migration pattern should be the same as non-hybrid whales because hybrids just travel together with normal whales. However, by listening to the location of the 52-hertz song, scientists have been able to determine that it does not migrate alongside other whales but migrates alone.
Second, the reading suggests that the high-pitch sound may connect with a damaged sense of hearing by raising the example of people who are born deaf. On the contrary, the professor says deafness cannot explain the extremely high pitch. Just like humans sound actually originates from the physical structure throat, an unusual high-pitch sound should come from an unusual throat structure. Therefore, it has nothing to do with hearing, let alone a damaged sense of hearing.
Third, the reading proposes that the 52-hertz whale may be the only known member of a rare species. By contrast, the professor casts doubt on it by adding a fact that even if the 52-hertz whale was from a rare species, it should also have had parents who produce the same high-pitch sound. However, advanced technology has been put underwater for several decades, but has never heard of any sound from its parents, which rules out the possibility of the 52-hertz whale being a member of rare species.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09848484848 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48880643762 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5644206445 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.499083148178 0.272083759551 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180722176162 0.0996497079465 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104950316349 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278157703624 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101478746755 0.0443174109184 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.