The reading states that there are several reasons that scientists are attempting to create a new type of broccoli that can be grown on the East Coast despite the hotter summers there.
On the contrary, the lecturer finds all the reasons mentioned by the reading dubious and refutes them all by specific details.
First, the reading states that growing broccoli locally would reduce transportation costs. On the contrary, the professor brings up the idea that maybe transportation cost reduced, but is not necessary to new broccoli was cheaper. If circumstances for growing this kind of broccoli were so hard, farmers of the east have to pay more cost for growing them because is a need for farmers doing hard work in the east.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that the new product will be more desirable to the consumer. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that people could be suspicious about the new product, there is trust in a regular company, and if the company change they could not be 100 percent sure that people buy the new product.
Finally, the author argues that broccoli growing so fast, and with this product, people get sooner to this vegetable vitamin. Conversely, the professor underlines that other vegetables with the easier condition for growing could arise in another east area. So it will be much better for to people use the different healthy product.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, in contrast, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94979079498 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53537842639 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55230125523 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4380016103 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.3 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459859377662 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178366059692 0.0996497079465 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100652305094 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236050972517 0.162205337803 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141447611286 0.0443174109184 319% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.