Zebra fish spread in america
speaker is agree with points made in passage in regards to damage caused by zebra mussel by emphesing that this fish is one of the best invasive species that caused problem in america by giving billion dollar damage. it travelled to america to russia via boats. As per passage they have ability to attach themselves to bottom of boats and pipelines that carry water to cities. To unblock the pipes huge amount of money is required.
To avoide this problem speaker suggested that every ship entering in america from russia should be thoroughly decontaminated and should be checked for presence of fish furthermore, anchors and chains should be sterilised with fish by following decontamination procedures.
In passage writer points out that there is no natural enemy for zebra fish but according to speaker this is misconception it is true that no other fish is their for spawning compitation but other animals like some birds, ducks as well as corcks are their natural enemy. they can stop expansion of zebra fish population. Scientist should work on increasing number of birds in the fish territory because birds natural count is lesser to show effective results. speaker hopes that this solution will work and we can limit the speed spreading of zebra mussel.
Hence in conclusion, the speaker lucidly substantiates his points of view with cogency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Speaker
speaker is agree with points made in passage i...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
speaker is agree with points made in passage in regards...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ker is agree with points made in passage in regards to damage caused by zebra mus...
^^
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...r is agree with points made in passage in regards to damage caused by zebra mussel by emphes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...aused by zebra mussel by emphesing that this fish is one of the best invasive specie...
^^^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...hat caused problem in america by giving billion dollar damage. it travelled to america ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...merica by giving billion dollar damage. it travelled to america to russia via boat...
^^
Line 9, column 271, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...well as corcks are their natural enemy. they can stop expansion of zebra fish popula...
^^^^
Line 9, column 460, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Speaker
...nt is lesser to show effective results. speaker hopes that this solution will work and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e speed spreading of zebra mussel. Hence in conclusion, the speaker lucidly subs...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, so, well, in conclusion, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12556053812 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65129765124 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587443946188 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.4726901447 49.2860985944 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.3 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3150099228 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105147450714 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809112581668 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141029695745 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933858720207 0.0443174109184 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.