Nowadays, the definition and the causes of lazy journalism, which was always debatable, has become controversial. It is strongly agreed upon the fact that lazy journalism is defined as brainless journalists coping and pasting unverified fake news. However, there are always some contention about it. In the following essay, I will elaborate on why lazy journalism is defined as irresponsible journalists coping and pasting and its cause before leading to a conclusion.
To begin with, there are numerous reasons why journalism is defined as such, but the most obvious one lies in the essence of journalism. As it is journalists’ duty to investigate, undercover and report the truth, lazy journalists go for the opposite and jump to the conclusion by using biased materials. For instance, during Hilary’s campaign for the president, fake news was spread all over the place on internet because of lazy journalism. Hence, lazy journalism is defined as such.
Furthermore, another predominant reason for this problem of lazy journalism is caused by the work stress from editors as they often set up difficult goals to those instead of focusing on the quality of them. According to the United Nations, it was reported that nearly 40% of editors have acknowledged they have published lazy journalism to finish their tasks. Therefore, the work stress of the editors was another major reason for lazy journalism.
In conclusion, lazy journalism stands for biased journalists who constantly use unfair and inaccurate materials in order to complete their work in time or for their own benefits. Editors and higher authorities should take charge of this phenomenon and make sure the truths are reported to the public.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32234432234 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00722115704 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5962133718 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.769230769 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 2.75862068966 362% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269758963966 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104193839752 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620942681219 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158336103465 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711186659086 0.0609392437508 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.