Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, a highly controversial issue has arisen regarding air travel can benefit just the prosperous peoples. Ordinary peoples neglect to employ aeroplanes because of the cost, thus the development of it does not have any benefit for them. I firmly concur with the opinion that the general people do not prefer to utilise aeroplanes because of costs.
To begin with, the poor people cannot afford the price of the aeroplanes. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further airports and machines and cars. Subsequently, final results revealed a highly complex relationship between transportation and the speed even though time efficiency should be taken into consideration. Thus, people can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between utilising gliders and their fees.
Furthermore, the development of the airliners is paramount for the human that uses it. For instance, quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne University concerning the advancement of the aircraft. Indeed, if the scientific research is inextricably linked to technologies and motors, the preliminary findings are closely allied with the improvement of equipment. Hence, its likely outcomes would be significantly correlated with the efficiency of using it by the affluent humans.
To recapitulate, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to believe that aircraft and their advancement can benefit the wealthy people which employing it. Moreover, not only should national institutions develop strategies, but also they should formulate them to alleviate the planes and transportation prices.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70238095238 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16664428922 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674603174603 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6023543534 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.538461538 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2284683401 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694503396887 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613415316665 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128220418717 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871403428932 0.0609392437508 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.