Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether the money spent on the space exploration is wasted. Whereas some people say that there are multiple other problems in the world and the money should be spent to fix those issues in place of space exploration, I sanguinely believe that money spent on space exploration has its own benefits. This essay will further elaborate reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that while space exploration many other experiments are done which helps us invisibly. According to my own experience, in my college days, I did multiple experiments, which reveal that money spends on science exploration is never wasted. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of space exploration apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that all most all the world problem can be solved with the money spent on the space exploration. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided view. Experiments done during space exploration helps us in many ways, For example with the help of satellite imaging now we can do the accurate weather forecast. Hence, It is correct to presume the preconceived notion of ill-informed people.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, the benefits of space exploration far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the benefits of space exploration prove its significance, but also pinpoints implications of not doing so.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: ALL_MOST[1]
Message: Did you mean 'almost'?
Suggestion: almost
... the contrary, skeptics conjecture that all most all the world problem can be solved wit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inpoints implications of not doing so.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, whereas, while, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21292775665 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88123123744 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558935361217 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6532615183 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337880083682 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115670503453 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119476154761 0.071462118173 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19492284517 0.151781067708 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783038929805 0.0609392437508 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.