Belching and unauthorised behaviour is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Give your response with justification.
These days, there is an ongoing debate among people about unusual habits that aren't marginalized inside of newer workplaces. While it is claimed that discipline must be there, my view is that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analyzing both sides of the argument.
There are several reasons why these behaviors do not allow in most offices. One of them is that the dress code, basically modern workplaces always grim and have company suites or dress code that staff should follow. It can also be argued that a plethora of staff roaming around without working but chatting gimmicks. It should also be taken into account that the employees who do not follow some rules of the company need to be disqualified from employment.
Those who argued for belching and unauthorized behaviors are not accepted from offices have a different view and say that it can actually a good thing. Firstly it is claimed that as a company employees should wear a proper dress to show the decent of the company. Then, there are concerns about roaming around must stop and focus work, because the company paying for work to them. But, some fragile are still there for not even care what is they have to be done.
To conclude, while there are strong arguments on both sides of the case, my personal opinion is that company must raise new rules for employees. I would strongly recommend that staff work hard without concern on other basic matters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
... among people about unusual habits that arent marginalized inside of newer workplaces...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...arguments on both sides of the case, my personal opinion is that company must raise new rules fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.828125 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41484615112 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5859375 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.6463747229 50.4703680194 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.0769230769 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.051284429617 0.242375264174 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0185213871952 0.0925447433944 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318254706581 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.030641479475 0.151781067708 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245844039257 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.5310837438 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.