Cities are now expanding; the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of government should make a better network for public transport for cities that are now expanding and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that build more roads to facilitate car ownership by the government can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, making a better network for public transport or building roads to facilitate car ownership in expanding cities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, expanding cities need more roads or better network for public transport made by the government might increase the consequences of critical needs. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a better network for public transport or more roads to facilitate car ownership in expanding cities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54104477612 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1033001319 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589552238806 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.5720923307 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.5 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430987126028 0.242375264174 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147373910228 0.0925447433944 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151815230896 0.071462118173 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260950597077 0.151781067708 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721844565175 0.0609392437508 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.