Cities are now expanding; the government should make a better network for public transport or
should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of public transportation and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of building subway stations is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that establishing online taxies can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, governmental services can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of modern transportation infrastructure, as well as equipped airlines, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered facilitated airports. Had it not been for this discovery, I wouldn’t have managed to do so. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both private cars and crowded highways apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of science, constructing more roads might increase the consequences of destroying nature. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of bus lanes would relate to this reality that the demerits of weak public transport network pertain to traffic jams. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of old-fashioned railways is correlated negatively with basic transportation needs. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of polluted towns.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of expanded megacities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of well-educated police officers prove the significance of decreasing car manufacturing, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71480144404 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41102320501 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693140794224 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5933494366 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.769230769 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115467695871 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033550787554 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027482809677 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0579003775626 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278658314212 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.01 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.