Recently, the phenomenon of using advertisement to influence people and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that buying more things is highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that promoting to more purchase can be a minus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to dismiss the wasteful advertisements. At first, the advertisements are important to more sale for companies and has a positive effect on the economy. However, encouraging people to buy more thing could affect on their living style negatively. For example, motivating people to buy unnecessary things can promote luxury- oriented in their life.
In addition, the improved economy which developed by adds could enable the companies to employ more workers. But, the purchasing of the things that people do not need can influence their financial situation. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2016 has shown that removing a significant number of unessential purchases can improve the financial situation in many families.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments about the influences of advertisements on people's living style, I am inclined to believe that the drawbacks of ads are far outweighed its advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of using advert...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ouraging people to buy more thing could affect on their living style negatively. For exam...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...romote luxury- oriented in their life. In addition, the improved economy which ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... financial situation in many families. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 222.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52702702703 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1732979406 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8954708828 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.545454545 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219964806169 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808992513132 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053303019953 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125546413751 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157558801915 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.