Do you agree with involving employees in decision making process?
Recently the phenomenon of involving the employee in the decision-making process and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that boosting the revenue of the company by workforce is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that participating workforce in making the informed decision can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, involving the employee in making the underlying decision can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted to this reality that protecting the brand, as well as adding the value of the company, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of using workforce in the decision-making process on promoting the company. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both creativity and innovation apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of dealing with the customers, involving workers in the matters of the company might increase the consequences of exploiting the financial resources. Moreover, fundamental aspects of creating a lucrative business would relate to this reality that the demerits of unreliable employee pertain to leaking out the secret information. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of involving low skilled employee is correlated with financial problems. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of creating the responsibility.
To conclude, while there are some compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of involving the employee in the decision-making process outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of improving the quality of products prove the significance of popularity of the company, but also pinpoint the strong relationship between manager and employee as practical implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1207.87684729 148% => OK
No of words: 312.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72756410256 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33953903355 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580128205128 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 379.143842365 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.1581207262 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.916666667 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350627003354 0.242375264174 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110394279409 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950845695488 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197704082202 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374136761374 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 55.0591133005 207% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.