Do you think carless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages?
The views of people are divided if it is possible to have a carless society. Some say that we are headed towards the direction of a society that is not dependent on cars but others do not believe on this.
For some, they perceived that a carless society is possible. They think that in the future people will transition in using other modes of transportation such as bicycles and trains. Using bicycle is not only beneficial to health but also to the environment. Bicycles do not produce toxic pollutants that can contribute to climate change. Efficient train system is also faster, cheaper and can transport more people from one place to another. The only disadvantage of bicycles and trains is that you cannot go to farther places that you want to visit. The places you can reach is dependent on the availability of the routes of the train. Clearly, this limitation prohibits the usage of bicycles and trains to be widely accepted.
On the other hand, cars are already a necessity. Mostly use cars as they feel more comfortable when they drive their own car and some use it also to earn additional income. It also less stressful and you can plan your route and decide when to leave your house without thinking that you may missed the train. Cars are also reliable than bicycle and trains as it is faster and you can use it even if the weather is not good. Some disadvantages pointed are that cars contributes to more than 20% of the recorded pollution as it uses fuels that produces pollutants and much more expensive to use.
In conclusion, I believe that a carless society is far from possible and unrealistic as we are totally dependent on the convenience it brings to us. It is much more reliable to any modes of transportation that is available now and its benefits outweighs its disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 20.9802955665 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65034965035 5.00649968141 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6288870259 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48951048951 0.580463131201 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 431.1 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8376381661 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.125 104.977214359 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0625 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173059313234 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060679560565 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543906526919 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114806900116 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398589020385 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 12.6369458128 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 11.5310837438 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.32886699507 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.