Do you think extreme sports like skiing, water rafting etc. are dangerous and should be prohibited?
Recently, the phenomenon of extreme sports and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance complex procedure is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substansial number by individuals. I am inclined to believe that dangerous exercises can be a plus and I will analyz that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, prohibiting sports can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in fact that doing extreme sports, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university students, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, benficial ramification of both dangerous method and unnormal activity apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, doing physical activity might increase the consequences of healthy life style. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negtively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of healthy activity.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe the benefits of high pressuer activity far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t thorny issues potential implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74891774892 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18352282282 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69696969697 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6316143895 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.727272727 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125537163391 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411479883388 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043878878597 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.065767638058 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442931396023 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.1 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.