e-books are completely taking over paper-based books. University libraries should focus on e-books only instead of paper-based books. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your opinion
In today's internet world e-books have gained more importance over paper-based books. There is a constant debate over which one has more advantages and disadvantages.
Today we are going to discuss both the pros and cons of using both e-books and paper-based books in the University libraries.
While everything around us is switching towards digital, e-books have taken over paper-based books. The University libraries should prefer to use them more,
as almost all the youngsters prefer to have a kindle or any digital e-book reader. It is easy to carry. The main advantage here is, one e-book reader can have multiple books,
compared to carrying all the printer books.E-books provide one-hand experience whereas printer books can be very heavy especially those which have thousands of pages.
E-book readers might look costly but it is a one-time investment when compared to buying or lending printed books. Highlight and bookmarking is easy in e-books compared to printed books.
E-books never go out of stock and will be always available even for a thousand students at the same time.
Even though e-books have these advantages, for some people they feel of the paper is the main factor, for avid readers holding a book in hand, the smell of a paper and flipping through
pages gives beautiful feeling which they would miss in e-books. Printed books can be shared with anyone, for example, a student who had lent a book from the library and wants to share it with one of his
friends of another university printed books make it possible whereas e-books cannot be shared and can only be used by one account, this means you cannot share the e-books without sharing your credentials,
thereby affecting one's privacy. Printed books are great when it comes to illustrations and displaying images, but e-books are not so good at these. It is also easy to skim back and forth on a printed book compared
to an e-book. One of the major advantages of a printed book is that no electrical power is required and one can carry it anywhere without worrying about charging.
In conclusion, it is not hard to see that e-books are better than paper books in many aspects. They are portable and they don’t occupy physical space.
They might cause eye strain but it can be easily prevented by using protective screens. More students can access the same e-book and there is no situation of the e-books going out of stock.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 45, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...lmost all the youngsters prefer to have a kindle or any digital e-book reader. It is eas...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 44, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: E-books
...pared to carrying all the printer books.E-books provide one-hand experience whereas pri...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Pages
...smell of a paper and flipping through pages gives beautiful feeling which they woul...
^^^^^
Line 21, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry and wants to share it with one of his friends of another university printed bo...
^^^^
Line 27, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
... and forth on a printed book compared to an e-book. One of the major advantages ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.5418719212 218% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 8.36945812808 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1207.87684729 169% => OK
No of words: 409.0 242.827586207 168% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98533007335 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 3.92707691288 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54200429924 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 139.433497537 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537897310513 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 623.7 379.143842365 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6551724138 150% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.2948513785 50.4703680194 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.315789474 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5263157895 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 14.0 4.12807881773 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365327648134 0.242375264174 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127940804384 0.0925447433944 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886644399272 0.071462118173 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154142868672 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747131380785 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.