education
In this day and age, the phenomenon of deducting marks and its corresponding effect has sparked heated controversy. Although contested by many that the mater of responsible pupils is highly profitable, such an issue is regarded both constructive and positive thoroughly by a considerable number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that impeccable assignments can be a good point, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
Initially, from a social viewpoint, students' assignments can provide the society with some conspicuous impacts which are rooted in the fact that being sophisticated, as well as practical education, are integrally bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I carried out an academic experiment that detected better scores. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both hard-working students and theoretical schooling apparently can be noticed.
Secondly, within the realm of science, overdue works might escalate the consequences of stressful methods. Furthermore, fundamental facets of being frustrated could correlate with this reality that the demerits of professional teachers are associated with modern schools. To shed light on this point, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university has asserted that the downside of contemporary methods is negatively related to being responsible. Hence, it is true to assume the preconceived notion of promising students.
To make a long story short, while there are several convincing arguments on both sides, I deeply believe that the benefits of deducting marks outnumber its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of depressed adults prove the significance of being easy-going, but also pinpoint a well- informed student implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69847328244 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27965663758 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68320610687 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0618605142 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.416666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.25397266985 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.242375264174 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0925447433944 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.071462118173 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151781067708 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.