Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples?
Recently, the phenomenon of effective learning's requirements and its corresponding effect has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of combining study and employment are highly beneficial, such an issue is regraded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that realistic statements can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, requirements of effective learning can supply the society with noticeable impacts, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of comfort and peace, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of distracting activities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of efficient study are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, combining study and employment can provide the community with negative effects, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of inefficient learning are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described impossible strenuous jobs. Hence, predicted outcomes of distracting statements are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of effective learning's requirements far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of combing study and employment prove the significance of impossible statements, but also pinpoint possible implications.
- Extreme sports Dangerous activities like skiing bungee jumping rafting diving should be banned Agree or disagree 85
- The importance of travel seems to be overrated Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home Travel is important for education To what extent to you agree or disagree 85
- Experience is the best teacher Some people think that life experience is more important than the formal teachers and books in schools and universities How far do you agree with this statement Give your reason or provide your personal experience 88
- Some languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 88
- What are the different methods students using to achieve information Online materials asking teachers or discussing with classmates 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92070484581 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33018669362 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63436123348 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6001992614 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.181818182 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311811933923 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956376773941 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532914392658 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170184562826 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170159208499 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.