Fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each year.
The problem of fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each year. Which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is hazardous while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate the negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that nowadays the many people waste the water with which very pollution water Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that some factory use very comical with which falling in rivers and other waters the bad water very dangerous for humans . Hence it is apparent why many are against this trend.
Steps to deal with problem are many but the most significant ones are not complicated but accessible and practicable practical besides some people use water washed cars and other things primarily but some people add water and use to slow. But some people not think the water and waste many water
According to the argument aforementioned above one can reach to a conclusion that the problem of fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each year can be successfully addressed provided that the above stated measures are taken.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...in large cities in the world each year. Which was always debatable has now become mor...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aste the water with which very pollution water Another pivotal aspect of this tr...
^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e water with which very pollution water Another pivotal aspect of this trend is ...
^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the bad water very dangerous for humans . Hence it is apparent why many are agai...
^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... bad water very dangerous for humans . Hence it is apparent why many are against thi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...primarily but some people add water and use to slow. But some people not think the ...
^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not think the water and waste many water According to the argument aforementioned...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04918032787 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47509880997 2.71678728327 91% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545081967213 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.215588512 50.4703680194 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 136.888888889 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309942299891 0.242375264174 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165491287345 0.0925447433944 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.293621259307 0.071462118173 411% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207409043225 0.151781067708 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135817367663 0.0609392437508 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.