Recently, the phenomenon of online digital media and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of obsolete libraries is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that university developments can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the role of the library can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of increasing digital media, as well as reading printed books, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the relationship between using online books and updating textbooks. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both e-learning policies and the disadvantages of updating textbooks apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, comparing physical books to e-books might increase the consequences of modern libraries. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of improving universities could relate to this reality that the demerits of digital sciences pertain to the side effects of digital media. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of university students is correlated negatively with online resources. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of textbooks of universities.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of online studies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of diminishing old libraries prove the significance of digital media procurement, but also pinpoint digital books implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73188405797 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2566558927 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63768115942 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4303297383 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.833333333 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329074206019 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961122900119 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526786699361 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178422875418 0.151781067708 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141669659951 0.0609392437508 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.01 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.