It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it will be expensive to do
so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it.
One of the conspicuous trend of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that it is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one's life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There is a numerous arguments in favor of my stance. Most preponderant one is that beautiful buildings of the past not only contribute to save the history of a country, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but also enhance the chances of productivity and quality of their lives. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting the benefit of prosperity and excellence are concerned.
There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of beautiful historical buildings of the past. The primary one stems from the fact that by observing the aforementioned trend, people have not only realized its gravity, but also gauged the magnitude of its repercussions when it comes to today's ever-changing lifestyle. Besides, its impact on buildings of the past is far-reaching indeed. Hence, it is apparent that why many are against preserving these historical buildings.
In view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks that benefits of preserving is indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ll only lead to a myriad of concerns in ones life. However, I do not entirely accept...
^^^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'argument'?
Suggestion: argument
...y in this essay. There is a numerous arguments in favor of my stance. Most preponderan...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98069498069 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82698262672 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9876755261 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17569753285 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658628251567 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544603773714 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102303675988 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588183291309 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 82.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 74.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.