It is inevitable that as technology advances, traditional cultures will be lost. It seems that we cannot have these two things together.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today's world, technology and culture have become an inextricable aspects because technology is leaving its imprint on culture. However, some opine that with the advancement in technology, traditional values and cultures are in jeopardy, thus cannot go together. Here, I partially accord with this statement.
To begin with, technology has oversimplified many things on account of which people are now able to comprehend several complicated things such as cultures, values and so on, in a better way due to manifold reasons. Firstly, technology facilitates someone to conveniently understand the culture because earlier, it was a pipe dream for people to know about culture, but now the roots of culture can be easily dug out, thereby one can become more intellectually sharp and aware. On the top of that, many people face several problems in visiting various cultural places owing to health issues, financial problems and many more, but now anyone can easily feel experience of cultural places by using technology, because every cultural place with full detail is available on the internet, which is again a best way to know a culture.
However, one cannot procrastinate the negative sides of technology on culture. Technology has made people more cynical and lethargic due to which people are no more active to even think about their culture, which seems very pathetic. Furthermore, changes in the mindset of people are the result of advance technology, which in turn has made people to not give more importance to their cultures and traditions, which is again a horrendous situation. For instance, it has noticed in many surveys that people prefer to spend more time on technology, rather than doing cultural activities.
In conclusion, I reckon one cannot be successful as long as he/she does not know his/her culture because cultures are the way of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'aspect'?
Suggestion: aspect
...and culture have become an inextricable aspects because technology is leaving its impri...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 796, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ailable on the internet, which is again a best way to know a culture. However,...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22333333333 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8340998963 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543333333333 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.0236813214 50.4703680194 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.454545455 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.25397266985 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145687754453 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065400508774 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377534959927 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102450476792 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315977228389 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.