Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What’s your opinion? Good or bad?

Essay topics:

Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What’s your opinion? Good or bad?

People are arguing that modern large shopping malls are surrogate for small shops. While some people think that small shops are not providing much to the community, others maintain that prominent shopping malls are not convenient for everyone. I am inclined to believe that both shopping malls and small shops have pros and cons, and I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
To begin with, the main purpose of a shopping mall is to provide multifarious products to their customers. These people have highly appreciated those shopping malls, who provided them with variety of products. For instance, in the current era various shopping malls are providing delivery services to their customers. According to my own experience, when I was studying at university, I always prefer ordering things online, because it was reliable and less time consuming.
From a social standpoint, people have underestimated the main benefits of having small shops near to their home. The one main benefit is that they do not have to spend a lot of time searching something in a big shopping mall, which they can easily find at a local store. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that in some cases small business proprietors have gained more prosperity than big business owners. Thus, it is hard to speculate the benefits of a big shopping mall with a small shop in a specific region.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that a small shop can be a plus point, because it does not make sense to buy a water bottle from a shopping mall rather than a local store.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, while, for instance, in some cases, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0035335689 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72848270338 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56890459364 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3463922631 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238718733386 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109387430405 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777817101962 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155216822795 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727763776706 0.0609392437508 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.