Recently, the phenomenon of law influence on changing human's behaviour and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of regulations is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that legislation could play an important role in humans behaviour's altering and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, lawful behaviour can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that being disciplined as well as organized, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic examination which discovered self-disciplined students with organizational behaviour are the result of regulation in schools. Thus, the beneficial consequences of regulation and discipline apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of freedom, low force legislation might increase the consequences of committing a crime. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of strict laws related to this reality that the demerits of juvenile delinquencies pertain to incorrect law implementation. As a tangible example, A scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of crime and violence are correlated negatively with shortage support of regulations. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of law influence on reducing the crime rate.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of legislation and its impact on human behaviour far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of providing self-disciplined prove the significance of legislation, but also pinpoint reduction of crimes implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: PROVE_PROOF[2]
Message: Did you mean 'proof' (noun) instead of prove (verb)?
Suggestion: proof
...dvantages of providing self-disciplined prove the significance of legislation, but al...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84057971014 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47592010609 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648550724638 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1808276617 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151877747061 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511551900227 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493536277858 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797591524233 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201202237952 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.