Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Do you agree or disagree? Give examples from your experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of learning a new language at early age and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of future aspects are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that agreeing to learn languages can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning a new language can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of helpful approaches, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of hard-working children. Thus, beneficial ramifications of bilingual persons are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, learning new languages can supply the community with noticeable effects, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of adverse effects are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described depressed children. Hence, predicted outcomes of awful experiences are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning a new language at early age far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of bilingual children prove the significance of brilliant aspects, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-11 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2020-03-06 | Alireza.r.m | 85 | view |
| 2017-12-03 | Amir NIkzad | 90 | view |
- Is hosting the Olympic Games bring any benefit to the host countries 88
- Should there be a wage cap for highly paid people Is it good or bad 73
- Increasing the price of fuels is the best way to solve pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 80
- What are the different methods students using to achieve information Online materials asking teachers or discussing with classmates 88
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of being over competitive to individuals and society 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63043478261 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21612489765 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639130434783 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9282906444 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.727272727 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296425636083 0.242375264174 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891735755233 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046041963001 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158573676762 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259994447831 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.