Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse?
The life expectancy of people is increased due to the drastic development in medical science has sparked the heated argument among a certain group of individuals. Many people consider this as the greatest achievement of technology. Others reject this notion and consider this as a curse to modern society. In my opinion, advancements in the medical field created more problems than benefits to humankind. This essay would further elaborate both sides with necessary evidence and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, there is no denying fact that due to development in medical field life expectancy of people has increased drastically. A recent data conducted by the University of Population Growth Development shows that average death of a person has increased from 46.7 in 1990 to 59.4 in 2016. The above data shows that humans are making health-related decisions and this achievement can be attributed to improvement in public health and medical care. For example, the new invention in the medical field had found solutions to many dreadful diseases such as cancer, HIV and many.
However, there are many pitfalls with the improvement in life expectancy, old people are living more and more years and due to that, there is an increase in financial burden on families like regular health checkups and daily visits to the hospital. It's good that one can stay with family for long years but financial burden can cause conflict within the family. In addition, living long life means a less working force for the country in terms of prosperity and less growth. Furthermore, it causes increasing in population and creates so many problems like poverty in people, the lack of basic facilities and many more problems.
To conclude, advancements in medical technology creates disadvantages rather than creating advantages for future life. In a nutshell, it can be concluded that an increase in average life expectancy rate can put up the burden on environment and society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...alth and medical care. For example, the new invention in the medical field had found solution...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 31.9359605911 160% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 322.0 242.827586207 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19875776398 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84388634058 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 530.1 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9918510613 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287255794987 0.242375264174 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826494205186 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577337594587 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169771313582 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556517732629 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.