Medical technology can increase life expectancy, Is it a blessing or cursed?
An advanced medical technology development plays a significant role in extending human longevity in the past few decades. A prolong living which is being a blessing or cursed become a controversial debatable topic in the society. There is a compelling arguments from two sides which is a blessing as a result of elongated life expectancy or which is a cursed leading to a financial burden to society. In this essay, I will elaborate both side of notions and will end my conclusion.
Growing aged population and associated issues is sitting on the top priority of Australian government agenda over last decade. The impacts of growing aged population are profound, from negative impact on economic growth to raising medical costs. For example, more new hospital and aged care facilities built within a short period to meet continues growing demands. A rapidly increase associated funding that may incur a negative impact to other sectors of public expenditures.
Despite aged population may incur a significant financial burden to society, elderly person can continues contribute to the society when they are in good health. An advanced medical technology can improve their health condition to allow them to live healthy and happily which are invaluable. Elderly people are also our foundation to human heritage, such as, their incredible and practical life experiences and living skills are not able to describe and recorded from text-book.
In my opinion, I incline to agreed that an advanced medical technology to extend life expectancy is a blessing. A healthy life is a happy life and the benefits of healthy happy life cannot measured by dollars
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...uman longevity in the past few decades. A prolong living which is being a blessing or cur...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'argument'?
Suggestion: argument
...c in the society. There is a compelling arguments from two sides which is a blessing as a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('rapidly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...riod to meet continues growing demands. A rapidly increase associated funding that may incur a neg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'continue'
Suggestion: continue
...l burden to society, elderly person can continues contribute to the society when they are...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24436090226 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87667689214 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7546240171 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.307692308 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265751070372 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792677821034 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618130050585 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144609084652 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664808054152 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.