In developed countries , most people are using different devices and some of the devices can reduce the human efforts. It is argued by some people that people seem to have less time to spend. In my opinion, technologies have enhanced the quality of human life; however the amount of time in using devices should be controlled.
Firstly, world has witnessed the sea change in the realm of technology in past few decades and many devices invented to help people. For instance, devices like mobile, car, home appliances are there to help people and people have benefited from these tools. Earlier most of the hours were spent on home chores, but with the help of devices this can be done in few minutes. People have more time to spend on other activities.
However, advancement of technology comes with its share of problems and one of the problems is the time spent of gadgets. People tend to spend more time than they need which cause pshycologica disorder in people. For example, many people are suffering from the addition of mobile and wasting their precious time which they can utilise in some quality work.
In conclusion, human society has seen many improvements in their life due to technology, but people should not get addicted of gadgets rather they should use it wisely. I think people should not be slaved of devices.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
In developed countries , most people are using different devices...
^^
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... people are using different devices and some of the devices can reduce the human efforts. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evices like mobile, car, home appliances are there to help people and people have...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86403508772 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42794759825 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548245614035 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 355.5 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6264375928 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4166666667 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196021962149 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864183581508 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675061774265 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12173037024 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334066862994 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 12.6369458128 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 61.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.