Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss
Recently, the phenomenon of spending time at work and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of real-life issues is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the personal life can be a plus, and I will examine that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, spending too much time at work can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact the family life, as well as the working life, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of living. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and working-class people apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the personal life might increase the consequences of the working condition. Moreover, unique aspects of the family life relate to this reality that the demerits of n pertain to applying for jobs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of lifelong relations is correlated negatively with the working environment. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of life issues.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of people' lives far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of well-paid jobs prove the significance of the happy life, but also pinpoint the private life implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35877862595 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10776099915 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637404580153 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6680327639 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266796410967 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835601819338 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793506001164 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141136529009 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550248948838 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.