Recently, the phenomenon of polygamy and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that divorce rate highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that having multiple wives can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From divorce rate standpoint, the dysfunctional family can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that husband, as well as spouse, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered 80 percent in the third world nation having more than one wives. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both happy marriage and intimate relationship can be seen.
Within the realm of marital life, fiscal problem might increase the consequences of the social problem. Moreover, fundamental aspects of polygamous relationship relate to this reality that the demerits of an ex-husband pertain to the co-wives. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of polyandry is correlated negatively with the burden of responsibility. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of abdicating your responsibilities.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of de facto relationship between wife and husband far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of happy marriage prove the significance of making a breakthrough, but also pinpoints of loving family implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, third, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62934362934 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32376597897 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671814671815 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1630317462 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0892322472148 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270731555604 0.0925447433944 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408360975815 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0498664154083 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508833272983 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.