In some countries, the no of shooting increase because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s word is colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that the no of shooting increase because many people have guns at home. There is a widespread worry that this will lead a myriad of concern in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and in will explain why in this essay.
There are number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that in some countries, the no of shooting increase because many people have guns at home can not only contribute to increase crime with guns, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy can convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are favor of in some countries, the no of shooting increase because many people have guns at home.
In view of the argument outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of In some countries, the no of shooting increase because many people have guns at home are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...the number of people believing that the no of shooting increase because many peopl...
^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...rant one is that in some countries, the no of shooting increase because many peopl...
^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...any are favor of in some countries, the no of shooting increase because many peopl...
^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... the benefits of In some countries, the no of shooting increase because many peopl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88489208633 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72413090506 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507194244604 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.6848617685 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.454545455 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375536428632 0.242375264174 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160043291054 0.0925447433944 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.209990808943 0.071462118173 294% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277719456352 0.151781067708 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820818586545 0.0609392437508 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.