In some countries, the no of shootings increases because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that the no of shootings increases because many people have guns at home. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that the no of shootings increases because many people have guns at home can not only contribute to many people have guns at home for safety. Government give permission to people to keep guns at home with licence, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when on follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of no of shootings increases because many people have guns at home.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of no of shootings increases because many people have guns at home are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...the number of people believing that the no of shootings increases because many peo...
^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
.... The most preponderant one is that the no of shootings increases because many peo...
^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...t is apparent why many are in favour of no of shootings increases because many peo...
^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
..., one can conclude that the benefits of no of shootings increases because many peo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84027777778 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75257446483 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9245108895 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.166666667 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369611497105 0.242375264174 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151860573079 0.0925447433944 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192017138764 0.071462118173 269% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266966939745 0.151781067708 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434621792681 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.