some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone.
The importance of governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. However, the substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. So, this essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that nowadays, the public transportation system are increasing day by day. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that public transportation systems are always economic for the individuals. Needless to say, all these merits are stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint there are some more merits but one of the crucial effect is that the development transportation such as railway station eases people in many ways as they are cheap and convenient. Besides, railways can be useful for travelling long distances as they are fast, comfortable and safe. Hence, it is apparent why many are against in favor of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, look, so, thus, while, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39837398374 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96546317498 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589430894309 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7112776 50.4703680194 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.727272727 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385270393683 0.242375264174 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119682849806 0.0925447433944 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176876547548 0.071462118173 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237109969944 0.151781067708 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155888570009 0.0609392437508 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.