Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of considering less theoritical subjects in universities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of theory-based program in universities is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive ba a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that abstract and pure science topic can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, knowledge based institutes can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that breaking through for undiscovered areas, as well as solution to modern humans' challenges, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which doscovered correct theory is base of correct practice. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both knowledge based researches and studies and discovery of resorts apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of only skill based institutes, lack of in depth knowledge might increase the consequences of more mistakes and problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of seprations of academical and vocational relate to this reality that the demerits of less theoritical pertain to low level skills. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of low skill is correlated negavtively with low confidence. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of more theories.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of more theoritical far outweigh its drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65648854962 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2540579929 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648854961832 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5937867305 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.727272727 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121214476085 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410013376141 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.020024089947 0.071462118173 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0632763175053 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252851626859 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.