Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples?
Recently, the phenomenon the Study and employment distract one from another and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of having considerable knowledge is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals, I believe that having extensive experience can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, employment exerting a profound influence on one's study can provide the society with some noticeable effect which is rooted in the fact that better learning as well as boosting mental acumen, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered mental ability. Thus, beneficial ramifications of study skill and better learning skills apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, a combination of employment and study might increase consequences of wandering attention. Moreover, fundamental aspects of waving concentration would relate to this reality that demerits of decreasing one's productivity pertain to lower natural learning. As a tangible example, some academic research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that downside of wasting time is correlated negatively to increasing mass unemployment. Hence, it is correct to presume preconceived notion of dismissal of workers.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that merits of effective learning which requires a great deal of time, comfort and tranquillity outweigh its demerits. Not only do the advantages of improving one's learning would prove the significance of different method of learning but also pinpoint higher education implications
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...his reality that demerits of decreasing ones productivity pertain to lower natural l...
^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...Not only do the advantages of improving ones learning would prove the significance o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77121771218 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22226648817 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664206642066 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1924778451 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.181818182 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130645342605 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467614460805 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597069945958 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702938509908 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262924857735 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.24 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.94827586207 191% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.